Raw HTML code (text and tags) for 9-8-10 blogburst post: Alan Keyes against the Flight 93 memorial

Just copy and paste into your HTML editor. (Alternatively, you can copy the formatted HTML from my Error Theory blog post.)


Alan Keyes against the Flight 93 memorial

<a href="http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/HonorFlight93/" target="_blank"><img src="http://i191.photobucket.com/albums/z36/AlecRawls/Blogburstlogoclickforpetition.jpg" border="0" alt="Blogburst logo, petition"/></a><a href="http://loyaltoliberty.com/"><img src="http://i191.photobucket.com/albums/z36/AlecRawls/Advertisements%20contra%20the%20crescent%20mosque/alan-keyes3_logo-size.jpg" border="0" alt="Alan Keyes, logo-size"></a>

Conservative hero <a href="http://loyaltoliberty.com/">Alan Keyes</a> is asking whether there is a <a href="http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=198473">pattern of submission</a> surrounding the nation's 9/11 sites. Apparently he has seen our <a href="http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/2010/08/29/flight-93-memorial-mosque/">video expose</a> of Islamic and terrorist memorializing features in the crescent memorial to Flight 93 (now called a broken circle). Like any straight-thinker, he doesn't like what he sees. The Flight 93 crash site is no place for a giant Islamic-shaped crescent, no matter what it is called.

On this point, Keyes cites Colorado Representative Tom Tancredo's 2005 objection to the newly unveiled Crescent of Embrace design:<blockquote>Back in 2005, then-Rep. Tom Tancredo was reported to have sent a letter to the National Park Service "asking the Interior Department to reconsider the crescent-shaped design of the memorial to those aboard a plane hijacked on Sept. 11, 2001, because some may think it honors the terrorists." Tancredo quite sensibly argues that "regardless of whether 'the invocation of a Muslim Symbol' was intentional, 'it seems that such a symbol is unsuitable for paying appropriate tribute to the heroes of Flight 93 or the ensuing American struggle against radical Islam.'"</blockquote>Keyes notes our claim that the design is still replete with terrorist memorializing features and he seems to find it credible. Why shouldn't he? The damning features are all right there in architect Paul Murdoch's <a href="http://www.crescentofbetrayal.com/supplementarymaterial.htm">design drawings</a>. Thank you Doctor Keyes!

<strong>"Itís not just embarrassing. It is a dangerous willful blindness, spurning the woken vigilance of Flight 93."</strong>

That's the last line of the full-page advertisement that Tom Burnett Senior and Alec Rawls will be running in the Somerset <em>Daily American</em> this Friday and Saturday (when the two first ladies will be in town for the 9/11 anniversary):

<a href="http://i191.photobucket.com/albums/z36/AlecRawls/Advertisements%20contra%20the%20crescent%20mosque/Ad2-ItWasTerrible-9-3-10_1000pxJPG.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://i191.photobucket.com/albums/z36/AlecRawls/Advertisements%20contra%20the%20crescent%20mosque/Ad2-ItWasTerrible-9-3-10_250pxJPG.jpg" border="0" alt="It_was-terrible_9-11-10_x250px"></a>
Click for <a href="http://i191.photobucket.com/albums/z36/AlecRawls/Advertisements%20contra%20the%20crescent%20mosque/Ad2-ItWasTerrible-9-3-10_1000pxJPG.jpg">legible image</a>. Full ad-copy PDF <a href="http://www.crescentofbetrayal.com/Ad2-ItWasTerrible-9-3-10.pdf">here</a> (large file warning).

We are hoping that visitors will hold onto our ad, maybe even tape it to their car windows, and most especially, show it to any press people they come across. Hey, if the Park Service can use 9/11 to plant the world's largest mosque on the Flight 93 crash site, we can use 9/11 to object.

To join our blogburst against the crescent mosque, just <a href="mailto:caoilfhionn1@gmail.com?cc=alec@rawls.org&subject=Blog url and email address to add to blogburst list">send</a> your blog's url.
<script language="javascript" src="http://rpc.blogrolling.com/display.php?r=c9772897903facc56d35d9d0f9360331" type="text/javascript"></script>